Skip to content

Risk Assessment (FMEA)

Document reference: GFTCL-RA-001 ยท Framework: GAMP 5 Category 5 ยท ICH Q9 risk principles

FortressAI Research Institute ยท Norwich, Connecticut Patents: USPTO 19/460,960 ยท USPTO 19/096,071 โ€” ยฉ 2026 Richard Gillespie

A risk-based assessment of the functions whose failure would most affect data integrity, value safety, or compliance. Severity (S), Occurrence (O), and Detection (D) are scored 1โ€“5; RPN = Sร—Oร—D drives the depth of qualification per function.


Failure-mode analysis

# Function Failure mode Effect S O D RPN Control
R1 Append-only persistence Record altered/deleted Loss of data integrity 5 1 1 5 DB UPDATE/DELETE abort triggers; SHA-256 witness; IQ schema check
R2 Private-key handling Key exposed via output/log/mesh Loss of custody 5 1 1 5 Mode-0600 file; CLI refuses export; pre-commit audit grep
R3 Federation cosignature Row unsigned / unverifiable Loss of attribution 4 1 1 4 signature_quintet per row; federation verify; MQ tests
R4 Bounded authority Franklin acts outside bounds Unauthorized operation 5 1 2 10 Authority TOML bounds; refused-set; V184 audit
R5 Constitutional floor Harmful op not refused Constitutional breach 5 1 1 5 C-007โ€ฆC-010 per measurement (V174)
R6 Exact arithmetic Float drift in value amount Value error 4 1 1 4 IntRational; floats refused at column
R7 Non-mainnet leakage testnet/sim path in production Wrong-network loss 5 1 1 5 Pre-commit audit grep; no sim mode
R8 Session replay Chain not reproducible Audit failure 4 1 2 8 V172 anchors; qc020 replay re-verify
R9 Configuration absence Daemon uses unsafe default Mis-target 5 1 1 5 Daemon refuses to start without required config
R10 Capacity scaling Invariant breaks at scale Measurement error 4 1 2 8 Invariants proven identical at any allocation; OQ/PQ

Risk priorities

The highest residual attention is on R4 (bounded authority), R8 (replay), and R10 (capacity) โ€” each carries the deepest qualification coverage (OQ + PQ + dedicated MQ tests). All controls are verified; no failure mode is left without a detect-and-refuse control.

Risk acceptance

Residual risk is acceptable: every high-severity failure mode has an occurrence control and a detection control, and every control traces to a qualification check in the RTM. New functions are added to this FMEA before they ship (see Change Control).


Federation-cosigned

This page's source is sealed in the GaiaFTCL federation manifest โ€” page SHA-256 f4a67d9a05f33f7cโ€ฆ, manifest witness a090592e0609adc8โ€ฆ, signed 2026-06-02T18:58:22Z by cell gaiaftcl-mac-cell. Verify with gaiaftcl wiki sign --all and compare wiki-all-signatures.json.