Risk Assessment (FMEA)

Document reference: GFTCL-RA-001 · Framework: GAMP 5 Category 5 · ICH Q9 risk principles

FortressAI Research Institute · Norwich, Connecticut

Patents: USPTO 19/460,960 · USPTO 19/096,071 — © 2026 Richard Gillespie

A risk-based assessment of the functions whose failure would most affect data

integrity, value safety, or compliance. Severity (S), Occurrence (O), and Detection (D)

are scored 1–5; RPN = S×O×D drives the depth of qualification per function.

---

Failure-mode analysis

# Function Failure mode Effect S O D RPN Control
R1 Append-only persistence Record altered/deleted Loss of data integrity 5 1 1 5 DB UPDATE/DELETE abort triggers; SHA-256 witness; IQ schema check
R2 Private-key handling Key exposed via output/log/mesh Loss of custody 5 1 1 5 Mode-0600 file; CLI refuses export; pre-commit audit grep
R3 Federation cosignature Row unsigned / unverifiable Loss of attribution 4 1 1 4 signature_quintet per row; federation verify; MQ tests
R4 Bounded authority Franklin acts outside bounds Unauthorized operation 5 1 2 10 Authority TOML bounds; refused-set; V184 audit
R5 Constitutional floor Harmful op not refused Constitutional breach 5 1 1 5 C-007…C-010 per measurement (V174)
R6 Exact arithmetic Float drift in value amount Value error 4 1 1 4 IntRational; floats refused at column
R7 Non-mainnet leakage testnet/sim path in production Wrong-network loss 5 1 1 5 Pre-commit audit grep; no sim mode
R8 Session replay Chain not reproducible Audit failure 4 1 2 8 V172 anchors; qc020 replay re-verify
R9 Configuration absence Daemon uses unsafe default Mis-target 5 1 1 5 Daemon refuses to start without required config
R10 Capacity scaling Invariant breaks at scale Measurement error 4 1 2 8 Invariants proven identical at any allocation; OQ/PQ

Risk priorities

The highest residual attention is on R4 (bounded authority), R8 (replay), and

R10 (capacity) — each carries the deepest qualification coverage (OQ + PQ +

dedicated MQ tests). All controls are verified; no failure mode is left without a

detect-and-refuse control.

Risk acceptance

Residual risk is acceptable: every high-severity failure mode has an occurrence control

and a detection control, and every control traces to a qualification check in the

RTM. New functions are added to this FMEA before

they ship (see Change Control).

---

*Federation cosignature: pending — gaiaftcl wiki sign --section GAMP5.*

Federation cosignature: pending operator signing host (v26). Witness (sha256 of rendered body): d8fa2bdaa3155d371252b1c3fbf2a43317aca3540fe1c8b5112ca85cdc738f6a. This page serves with a substrate-honest pending-signature notice until the operator's Franklin signer cosigns it.